Use case

The minutes should not take longer than the meeting.

Councils, committees, and boards record their sessions and then write the record days later, from a voice memo and whoever remembers best. The recording was always the evidence. It just was not usable.

council-session-14.m4a

42:18
Speaker 100:04

އައްސަލާމް ޢަލައިކުމް

Speaker 200:11

ތިބޭފުޅާއާ އެންމެ ގުޅެނީ ކޮން ދާއިރާއެއް؟

SummarisePull decisionsDraft minutes

How it goes today

  1. 01A two-hour Dhivehi session is recorded on a phone and filed somewhere
  2. 02Someone scrubs through it, typing and rewinding, for most of a day
  3. 03Who said what gets reconstructed from memory, which is where disputes start
  4. 04The record is circulated late, and corrections arrive later still

How it goes instead

  1. 01Upload the recording and let the job run in the background
  2. 02Get Dhivehi text with speaker labels, so attribution comes from the recording
  3. 03Correct names and split blocks where the audio was unclear
  4. 04Ask for the decisions and action points, then edit the draft record in the same thread

Every tool, on every plan.

Go, Pro, and Max are self-serve monthly plans billed through Bank of Maldives. Offices and institutions take an invoiced corporate or government package instead. Either way you get the whole toolset, not a tier of it.

Who reaches for it

  • Council and committee secretaries
  • Board secretariats and governance teams
  • Researchers and journalists working from interviews

Questions people actually ask

Start writing in Dhivehi today.

Create a free account and send your first letter, translation, or transcript in the next few minutes.